Introduction
When it comes to thermal clip-ons, every hunter has their preferences — some want simplicity and reliability, others are drawn to advanced functions and integration.
In this comparison, I’ve used two serious tools side by side in real hunting conditions: the Guide TB650P 2.0 and the Nocpix MATE H50R.
Both are capable, both are accurate, but they feel completely different in the field.
This isn’t about declaring one “better.” It’s about how they differ — in handling, image quality, and real-world performance when mounted on a day scope.
By the end, you’ll probably know which one fits your rifle better.
Handling and Build
From the first moment you pick them up, you notice a difference in personality.
The TB650P 2.0 feels solid and heavy — a “workhorse” kind of build. It’s slightly longer, and you feel that mass when carrying it on longer hunts. It gives confidence but also adds fatigue after a few hours.
The MATE H50R, on the other hand, is lighter and more compact. It feels more modern, with smoother ergonomics and a cleaner layout. During long walks or stalks, the difference in weight becomes obvious — the MATE is simply easier to handle.
There’s also a notable difference in the ocular design:
- TB650P 2.0 – about a 2 cm exit, with an M33.5 thread.
- MATE H50R – a 3.5 cm exit, with a standard M52 thread.
That larger ocular on the MATE allows more light through the day scope, giving a brighter, more natural image — especially in daylight or twilight transitions.
Both can use quick-release mounts, but they give different impressions:
- The TB650P 2.0 feels like a rugged, traditional thermal tool.
- The MATE H50R feels agile, refined, and gives a more open view through your optics.
Image Quality
Image quality is where things get interesting.
Both devices provide clear and sharp thermal images that are fully usable for hunting. Animals stand out clearly, and identification is easy.
Through my 5–30× day scope, I found that:
- The TB650P 2.0 maintains a clean, crisp image up to around 12–14× magnification before the picture starts to soften.
- The MATE H50R holds detail further — up to 18–20× while keeping the picture surprisingly sharp.
In side-by-side footage, the difference is visible. The MATE simply holds resolution longer when zooming in. But both perform more than well enough for practical hunting distances.
Rangefinder Performance
Both thermals include built-in laser rangefinders, and in the field that’s a real advantage.
Each gives reliable readings with consistent accuracy once you get used to where the range reticle appears on screen.
There’s no major winner here — both can be trusted for hunting use, helping you confirm distance quickly without extra gear.
Features and Extras
Here’s where the two models start to separate in philosophy.
Both can record video and use recoil-activated recording, meaning even if you forget to hit record, the shot is automatically saved.
The MATE H50R, however, goes further with integrated tech:
- Ballistic correction: works with the built-in rangefinder to automatically compensate for bullet drop. After measuring distance, it slightly shifts the display to match the real point of impact. It’s subtle, but it helps with faster, more confident shots at varying ranges.
- Magic Zoom: a small magnetic sensor that mounts on your day scope’s magnification ring. It syncs your optical zoom (x3, x6, x9) with the thermal’s digital zoom to keep the image perfectly aligned and stable.
The TB650P 2.0 keeps things simpler — no complex menus, no extra integrations. It focuses on reliability and ease of use, which some hunters prefer.
So it really comes down to two philosophies:
- The MATE H50R offers integration and automation.
- The TB650P 2.0 delivers straightforward, proven usability.
Calibration
Both devices require periodic calibration.
The TB650P 2.0 uses a mechanical shutter, which causes a brief image freeze.
The MATE H50R performs it quietly and smoothly — you barely notice the pause.
Not a dealbreaker for either, but worth noting if you spend long hours scanning continuously.
Battery Life and Durability
Both thermals use standard 18650 batteries, which is great for field use — easy to replace, widely available.
In real hunting use:
- MATE H50R lasts close to five hours on one cell, depending on temperature and recording use.
- TB650P 2.0 runs around three and a half to four hours, also depending on settings.
The MATE has a quick-release battery latch, making swaps easy even in darkness.
The TB uses a screw-cap battery system, slower but secure and rugged.
Both are made from magnesium alloy, well sealed, and feel extremely solid — no rattles, no cheap plastic. Built for real-world hunting conditions.
Price and Value
There’s a clear price gap:
- Guide TB650P 2.0 – around €2600
- Nocpix MATE H50R – around €3000
The TB650P 2.0 offers great value for hunters who want dependable performance without extra layers of tech.
The MATE costs a bit more but adds advanced features, a larger ocular, and smoother usability — edging into premium territory.
It really depends on your priorities:
- If you want simplicity and proven reliability, the TB650P 2.0 fits the bill.
- If you prefer more control, smarter integration, and lighter handling, the MATE H50R justifies the difference.
Conclusion
Both the Guide TB650P 2.0 and the Nocpix MATE H50R are excellent thermal clip-ons that perform impressively in the field.
The TB feels like a solid, no-nonsense workhorse — built to last and easy to operate.
The MATE feels like a next-generation thermal — lighter, smarter, and packed with features that make real hunting smoother.
Personally, after using both on multiple hunts, I find myself reaching for the MATE more often — not because it’s “better,” but because it feels faster and more natural to use during long nights in the field.
Whichever one you choose, you’ll be well equipped — both deliver performance hunters can rely on.